Background Default Knowledge and Causality Ascriptions
نویسندگان
چکیده
A model is defined that predicts an agent’s ascriptions of causality (and related notions of facilitation and justification) between two events in a chain, based on background knowledge about the normal course of the world. Background knowledge is represented by nonmonotonic consequence relations. This enables the model to handle situations of poor information, where background knowledge is not accurate enough to be represented in, e.g., structural equations. Tentative properties of causality ascriptions are explored, i.e., preference for abnormal factors, transitivity, coherence with logical entailment, and stability with respect to disjunction and conjunction. Empirical data are reported to support the psychological plausibility of our basic definitions.
منابع مشابه
Predicting causality ascriptions from background knowledge: model and experimental validation
A model is defined that predicts an agent’s ascriptions of causality (and related notions of facilitation and justification) between two events in a chain, based on background knowledge about the normal course of the world. Background knowledge is represented by nonmonotonic consequence relations. This enables the model to handle situations of poor information, where background knowledge is not...
متن کاملFrom Acceptation Relations to Causality Ascription in a Belief Function Framework
From a generic set of uncertain pieces of information about the normal course of things and a temporal sequence of reported facts, an intelligent artifact should be able to identify causally related events and distinguish between factors that facilitate or justify the occurrence of events from other facts. In this paper, we propose a model for causality and facilitation ascriptions when the bac...
متن کاملContrasts in reasoning about omissions
Omissions figure prominently in causal reasoning from diagnosis to ascriptions of negligence. One philosophical proposal posits that omissions are accompanied by a contrasting alternative that describes a case of orthodox (nonomissive) causation (Schaffer, 2005; Bernstein, 2014). A psychological hypothesis can be drawn from this contrast view of omissions: by default, humans should interpret om...
متن کاملConstraints , Causal Rules and Minimal
We consider knowledge base update while the domain constraints are explicitly taken into account. We argue that the traditional constraint form is problematic to capture the causality of the domain, and ignoring this point may lead to diiculties in knowledge base updates. To handle this problem properly, it is necessary to describe the causal rules of the domain explicitly in the update formali...
متن کاملRepresenting Actions in Default Logic : A Situation
We address the problem of representing common-sense knowledge about action domains in the formalism of default logic. We employ a methodology proposed by Gelfond and Lifschitz which involves rst deening a high-level language for representing knowledge about actions, and then specifying a translation from the high-level action language into a general-purpose formalism, such as default logic. Acc...
متن کامل